This is news!
It seems as if just a few years ago I actually used to get excited about the big night. The big night that was last night, the 87th Academy Awards. I used to watch with friends, with family. I even went to an awards party once.
In the past I even saw the movies that won — before they won.
And I think that’s how some of us have been feeling lately about industry standard performance benchmarks. Remember the good old days of leapfrogging? Of vicious ads and blogs? Of fights over TPC-C?
But recently I was super impressed with a brand new IBM publish last week of the SPECjEnterprise2010 benchmark. SPECjEnterprise2010 emulates an automobile dealership, manufacturing, supply chain management and order/inventory system and was designed to stress the Java EE application server. It’s an excellent measure of middleware.
The new IBM result running WebSphere and DB2 was the best…
View original post 288 more words
IBM Integration Bus version 9 includes many capabilities that set it apart from the competition, but recently while comparing it to Software AG webMethods and SAP PI one item in particular stood out – Patterns and Pattern Authoring.
If you’re not already familiar with IIB Patterns, you can read all about them in this document written by Ben Thompson, an IBM Integration Bus Architect. As Ben explains, a Pattern is a reusable solution that provides a tested approach to solving a design or deployment task in a particular context. What this means for an organization is that you can quickly make use of the included Patterns to shorten and standardize your integration development activities.
Essentially, Patterns are a way for you to simplify your development, allowing you to create top-down parameterized connectivity solutions. This can be a tremendous time saver, enabling faster time to value and improved code quality. IIB…
View original post 157 more words
When IBM shipped WebSphere Application Server v8.5.5 in June this year there were a couple of new license options made available: (1) Liberty Profile Core and (2) Liberty Profile Core for ISVs. I am very excited for these new members of the product family. This time IBM has done something unusual. ISVs are now able to use Liberty Core to develop applications at no charge and customers of those ISVs can deploy such applications without having to buy license and support for Liberty Core. I believe this move was made by IBM to address competitive pressure from Tomcat, Jetty and other free software.
You might ask, why do I like this change? It would seem that being IBM employee I would want IBM customers to pay for software, not give it away for free. The truth is that there are many small applications that do not require high quality of…
View original post 349 more words
Over the last few months, I’ve had several conversations about mobile business applications that remind me of early discussions and debates around SaaS a decade ago. When Emergence first invested in Salesforce.com in 2003, we heard all kinds of reasons why Software-as-a-Service wouldn’t work. Yet, cloud-based computing enabled a fundamental shift in software design, go-to-market strategies, and cost structure. Today SaaS companies are quickly coming to dominate the business application market.
I feel like we are on the cusp of a similarly fundamental shift in business software. Once again, the change is about rethinking business applications, but this time it is with a mobile lens. When talking with companies that don’t have a specific mobile strategy, I keep hearing about how mobile is just a feature of cloud-based applications. Yet when we meet with entrepreneurs who are building “mobile-first” business apps, we can see a completely different way of thinking:…
View original post 840 more words